按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
esting thing did happen。 after a time； the substancebegan to glow。 moreover； when exposed to air； it often spontaneously burst into flame。
the mercial potential for the stuff鈥攚hich soon became known as phosphorus； fromgreek and latin roots meaning 鈥渓ight bearing鈥濃�攚as not lost on eager businesspeople； but thedifficulties of manufacture made it too costly to exploit。 an ounce of phosphorus retailed forsix guineas鈥攑erhaps five hundred dollars in today鈥檚 money鈥攐r more than gold。
at first； soldiers were called on to provide the raw material； but such an arrangement washardly conducive to industrial…scale production。 in the 1750s a swedish chemist named karl（or carl） scheele devised a way to manufacture phosphorus in bulk without the slop or smellof urine。 it was largely because of this mastery of phosphorus that sweden became； andremains； a leading producer of matches。
scheele was both an extraordinary and extraordinarily luckless fellow。 a poor pharmacistwith little in the way of advanced apparatus； he discovered eight elements鈥攃hlorine； fluorine；manganese； barium； molybdenum； tungsten； nitrogen； and oxygen鈥攁nd got credit for none ofthem。 in every case； his finds were either overlooked or made it into publication aftersomeone else had made the same discovery independently。 he also discovered many usefulpounds； among them ammonia； glycerin； and tannic acid； and was the first to see themercial potential of chlorine as a bleach鈥攁ll breakthroughs that made other peopleextremely wealthy。
scheele鈥檚 one notable shorting was a curious insistence on tasting a little of everythinghe worked with； including such notoriously disagreeable substances as mercury； prussic acid（another of his discoveries）； and hydrocyanic acid鈥攁 pound so famously poisonous that150 years later erwin schr？dinger chose it as his toxin of choice in a famous thoughtexperiment （see page 146）。 scheele鈥檚 rashness eventually caught up with him。 in 1786； agedjust forty…three； he was found dead at his workbench surrounded by an array of toxicchemicals； any one of which could have accounted for the stunned and terminal look on hisface。
were the world just and swedish…speaking； scheele would have enjoyed universal acclaim。
instead credit has tended to lodge with more celebrated chemists； mostly from the english…speaking world。 scheele discovered oxygen in 1772； but for various heartbreakingly plicated reasons could not get his paper published in a timely manner。 instead credit wentto joseph priestley； who discovered the same element independently； but latterly； in thesummer of 1774。 even more remarkable was scheele鈥檚 failure to receive credit for thediscovery of chlorine。 nearly all textbooks still attribute chlorine鈥檚 discovery to humphrydavy； who did indeed find it； but thirty…six years after scheele had。
although chemistry had e a long way in the century that separated newton and boylefrom scheele and priestley and henry cavendish； it still had a long way to go。 right up to theclosing years of the eighteenth century （and in priestley鈥檚 case a little beyond） scientistseverywhere searched for； and sometimes believed they had actually found； things that justweren鈥檛 there： vitiated airs； dephlogisticated marine acids； phloxes； calxes； terraqueousexhalations； and； above all； phlogiston； the substance that was thought to be the active agentin bustion。 somewhere in all this； it was thought； there also resided a mysterious 茅lanvital； the force that brought inanimate objects to life。 no one knew where this ethereal essencelay； but two things seemed probable： that you could enliven it with a jolt of electricity （anotion mary shelley exploited to full effect in her novel frankenstein ） and that it existed insome substances but not others； which is why we ended up with two branches of chemistry：
organic （for those substances that were thought to have it） and inorganic （for those that didnot）。
someone of insight was needed to thrust chemistry into the modern age； and it was thefrench who provided him。 his name was antoine…laurent lavoisier。 born in 1743； lavoisierwas a member of the minor nobility （his father had purchased a title for the family）。 in 1768；he bought a practicing share in a deeply despised institution called the ferme g茅n茅rale （orgeneral farm）； which collected taxes and fees on behalf of the government。 althoughlavoisier himself was by all accounts mild and fair…minded； the pany he worked for wasneither。 for one thing； it did not tax the rich but only the poor； and then often arbitrarily。 forlavoisier； the appeal of the institution was that it provided him with the wealth to follow hisprincipal devotion； science。 at his peak； his personal earnings reached 150；000 livres a year鈥攑erhaps 20 million in today鈥檚 money。
three years after embarking on this lucrative career path； he married the fourteen…year…olddaughter of one of his bosses。 the marriage was a meeting of hearts and minds both。 madamelavoisier had an incisive intellect and soon was working productively alongside her husband。
despite the demands of his job and busy social life； they managed to put in five hours ofscience on most days鈥攖wo in the early morning and three in the evening鈥攁s well as thewhole of sunday； which they called their jour de bonheur （day of happiness）。 somehowlavoisier also found the time to be missioner of gunpowder； supervise the building of awall around paris to deter smugglers； help found the metric system； and coauthor thehandbook m茅thode de nomenclature chimique ； which became the bible for agreeing on thenames of the elements。
as a leading member of the acad茅mie royale des sciences； he was also required to take aninformed and active interest in whatever was topical鈥攈ypnotism； prison reform； therespiration of insects； the water supply of paris。 it was in such a capacity in 1780 thatlavoisier made some dismissive remarks about a new theory of bustion that had beensubmitted to the academy by a hopeful young scientist。 the theory was indeed wrong； but thescientist never forgave him。 his name was jean…paul marat。
the one thing lavoisier never did was discover an element。 at a time when it seemed as ifalmost anybody with a beaker； a flame； and some interesting powders could discover something new鈥攁nd when； not incidentally； some two…thirds of the elements were yet to befound鈥攍avoisier failed to uncover a single one。 it certainly wasn鈥檛 for want of beakers。
lavoisier had thirteen thousand of them in what was； to an almost preposterous degree； thefinest private laboratory in existence。
instead he took the discoveries of others and made sense of them。 he threw out phlogistonand mephitic airs。 he identified oxygen and hydrogen for what they were and gave them boththeir modern names。 in short； he helped to bring rigor； clarity； and method to chemistry。
and his fancy equipment did in fact e in very handy。 for years； he and madamelavoisier occupied themselves with extremely exacting studies requiring the finestmeasurements。 they determined； for instance； that a rusting object doesn鈥檛 lose weight； aseveryone had long assumed； but gains weight鈥攁n extraordinary discovery。 somehow as itrusted the object was attracting elemental particles from the air。 it was the first realization thatmatter can be transformed but not eliminated。 if you burned this book now； its matter wouldbe changed to ash and smoke； but the net amount of stuff in the universe would be the same。
this became known as the conservation of mass； and it was a revolutionary concept。
unfortunately； it coincided with another type of revolution鈥攖he french one鈥攁nd for this onelavoisier was entirely on the wrong side。
not only was he a member of the hated ferme g茅n茅rale； but he had enthusiastically builtthe wall that enclosed paris鈥攁n edifice so loathed that it was the first thing attacked by therebellious citizens。 capitalizing on this； in 1791 marat； now a leading voice in the nationalassembly； denounced lavoisier and suggested that it was well past time for his hanging。
soon afterward the ferme g茅n茅rale was shut down。 not long after this marat was murderedin his bath by an aggrieved young woman named charlotte corday； but by th